CJI Chandrachud

It's important to note that the behavior of the Chief Justice of India (CJI) or any judge in the Supreme Court is not generally driven by personal biases or prejudices. Judges in the highest court are expected to uphold the principles of impartiality, independence, and judicial integrity while deciding cases.

If there are perceptions of bias, it is crucial to examine the specific cases and judgments in question rather than making generalizations. Judges base their decisions on legal principles, constitutional provisions, and precedents, and not on personal affiliations. Decisions in the Supreme Court are thoroughly debated and subject to extensive legal analysis.

It is normal for different governments and groups to have varying views on legal matters, and these differences can lead to disagreements and debates in court. Sometimes, decisions may be perceived as unfavorable to a particular government or group, but that doesn't necessarily indicate bias on the part of the judges.

It's essential to have faith in the judiciary and its commitment to delivering justice impartially and without favoritism to any individual, government, or community. If anyone believes that there is a legitimate concern regarding the neutrality of a judge or the judiciary as a whole, there are established legal mechanisms for addressing such issues, including appeals, recusal, and petitions for review.

In summary, the perception that the CJI or the judiciary is always against the Modi government or Hindus is a complex issue and should be assessed based on individual case analysis rather than broad generalizations. The independence of the judiciary is a cornerstone of any democratic system, and it is designed to ensure fair and impartial justice for all citizens, irrespective of their affiliations.